By Michael D. Sellers
How did Disney's movie develop into a calamity of ancient proportions? Michael dealers, a Hollywood filmmaker himself, observed the catastrophe drawing close and fought to save lots of the venture - yet with out luck. In John Carter and the Gods of Hollywood, info each blunder and betrayal that ended in the doom of the movie - and that left numerous Hollywood careers within the wreckage.
John Carter and the Gods of Hollywood examines each element of Andrew Stanton's variation and Disney's campaign and seeks to respond to the query: What went incorrect? it contains a historical past of Hollywood's a hundred 12 months attempt to deliver the movie to the monitor, and examines the worldwide fan circulation spawned by means of the movie.
Read Online or Download John Carter and the Gods of Hollywood PDF
Similar film books
Cinema and Spectatorship is the 1st booklet to concentration fullyyt at the background and function of the spectator in modern movie reviews. whereas Seventies movie thought insisted on a contrast betweeen the cinematic topic and film-goers, Judith Mayne means that a truly actual friction among "subjects" and "viewers" is in truth critical to the examine of spectatorship.
Whereas the wounded and worried Monster he created spreads terror during the nation aspect, Dr. Frankenstein is persuaded via a colleague to create a girl to be the Monster's bride.
Well-known as one of many prime gurus on American movie, Leonard Maltin is additionally a mother or father who's conscious of the variations among a child's and critic's point of view on movies. every one movie indexed comprises its MPAA ranking, an evidence of that ranking, classification, and the author's personal ranking method of even if a movie is sweet, undesirable, or ok for either older and more youthful young children.
Knockout: The Boxer and Boxing in American Cinema is the 1st book-length examine of the Hollywood boxing movie, a favored motion picture leisure because the Thirties, that incorporates such classics as "Million buck Baby," "Rocky," and "Raging Bull. " The boxer stands along the cowboy, the gangster, and the detective as a personality that formed America's principles of manhood.
- House of Fear (Movie monsters)
- The Triumph of Propaganda: Film and National Socialism, 1933-1945
- Film Analysis: A Casebook
- The Annotated Godfather: The Complete Screenplay with Commentary on Every Scene, Interviews, and Little-Known Facts
- Apocalypse on the Set: Nine Disastrous Film Productions
Additional resources for John Carter and the Gods of Hollywood
15. One could, I suppose, argue that Jesus – the protagonist of a number of ﬁlms from Hollywood and elsewhere – was a philosopher. But his thought is not usually a central feature of these ﬁlms. ) Scorsese’s 1988 The Last Temptation of Christ may be an honourable exception here. 16. McKenna (2002), (accessed on-line 28/7/04). 17. Hence perhaps the novelty of Descartes’ ﬁrst-person narrative of the Meditations or Hume’s occasional importation of himself into his Treatise (‘when I enter most intimately into what I call my self…’).
Lm(s) as actually doing philosophical work, rather than merely illustrating philosophical theses. If this book succeeds, then, it will succeed among other things in showing that diverse ﬁlms can be/do philosophy. But why should it be thought that such a task uniquely has to do with Wittgenstein and Cavell? Is it because these two philosophers have a powerful ﬁlm theory which can reach ﬁlms – or aspects of those ﬁlms – beyond the grasp of ‘Psychoanalytical theory’ or ‘Cognitive theory’? 1 It is a striking feature of the essays in this collection, especially evident perhaps in the essay by Critchley, that they do not attempt to apply any ﬁlm theory, not even an allegedly ‘Wittgensteinian’ one, to the ﬁlms they discuss.
At times, he is trying to produce order in his own thoughts, to get things clear to himself. But at other times X tries to order the world, to get the events outside of himself to match his mental picture of them. In the most notorious instance of this, what appears cinematically to be leading towards a depiction of X’s rape of A is headed off by a burst of ecstatic music and images while X’s voiceover denies almost hysterically what is being implied. (‘Non, non, non! … Ce n’était pas de force….