By J. Mo, Mo Jongryn
This quantity is the results of a 2013 convention held by way of the Asan Institute for coverage reviews (South Korea) at the 'middle energy' nations of Mexico, Indonesia, the Republic of Korea, Turkey and Australia (MIKTA). specialists and policymakers mentioned how contributors of the MIKTA can paintings to boost worldwide governance in rising international factor components.
Read Online or Download MIKTA, Middle Powers, and New Dynamics of Global Governance: The G20’s Evolving Agenda PDF
Similar diplomacy books
The BRICS and the Future of Global Order
The transformation of the BRIC acronym from an funding time period right into a family identify of foreign politics and, extra lately, right into a semi-institutionalized political outfit (called BRICS, with a capital ‘S’), is likely one of the defining advancements in overseas politics long ago decade. whereas the concept that is now general within the normal public debate and foreign media, there has no longer but been a complete and scholarly research of the historical past of the BRICS time period.
This publication investigates kin among Israel, the Palestinian territories and the ecu Union by way of contemplating them as interlinked entities, with relatives among any of the 3 events affecting the opposite aspect. The individuals to this edited quantity discover diversified points of Israeli-Palestinian-European Union interconnectedness.
This publication, in its attempt to formulate compatibility among Islamic legislations and the rules of foreign diplomatic legislations, argues that the necessity to harmonize the 2 criminal structures and feature an intensive cross-cultural figuring out among countries as a rule with the intention to bettering unfettered diplomatic cooperation might be of paramount precedence.
Summits: Six Meetings That Shaped the Twentieth Century
The chilly struggle ruled international background for almost part a century, locking superpowers in an international contention that in simple terms ended with the Soviet cave in. the main decisive moments of twentieth-century international relations happened whilst international leaders met face to face—from the mishandled summit in Munich, 1938, which prompted the second one international battle, to Ronald Reagan's striking chemistry with Mikhail Gorbachev at Geneva in 1985.
- China’s Resource Diplomacy in Africa: Powering Development?
- Diplomatic Theory of International Relations
- Post–Cold War
- The United Nations Security Council: A Primer (Global Institutions)
- A Democratic Audit of the European Union
Additional info for MIKTA, Middle Powers, and New Dynamics of Global Governance: The G20’s Evolving Agenda
Sample text
Org/publication/ dynamic-equilibrium-indonesias-blueprint-21st-century-asia-pacific. 14 Carlyle A. com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/NG27Ae03. html. com/en/news/75754/indonesia-fits-as-middle-powercountry. _r=0. html. 18 For an overview see: Stephen Kinzer, Reset: Iran, Turkey, and America’s Future (New York: Times Books, 2010). com/articles/2011/05/05/arab_spring_turkish_fall. com/ articles/67974/mustafa-akyol/turkeys-maturing-foreign-policy. dpbs. edu/~/media/ research/files/papers/2013/02/mexico%20new%20security%20policy%20 felbabbrown/mexico%20new%20security%20policy%20felbabbrown.
Much like Korea’s hosting of the November 2010 Seoul G20, Canada made strategic use of its position as host of the June 2010 Toronto G8 summit to play a significant policy entrepreneurial role. Canada’s policy entrepreneurialism has unfolded in the policy dimension of health care and more precisely Child and Maternal Health, through the development of the Muskoka Initiative. The Muskoka Initiative focuses on core priorities to bolster child and maternal health in developing countries and seeks to compliment the UN Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).
Nytimes. all=true. 0005 3 G20 Middle Powers and Initiatives on Development Andrew F. Cooper Abstract: This chapter addresses how the category of middle powers (MPs) can potentially utilize the opportunity for leadership through the MIKTA initiative. What distinguishes MPs from both big and small states is the functional focus on issue-specific niche efforts. As potential “bridges” in the global governance architecture within the context of the G20, non-traditional MPs have special capacity for leveraging their specific diplomatic attributes.