Floer Homology Groups in Yang-Mills Theory by S. K. Donaldson

By S. K. Donaldson

This monograph supplies an intensive exposition of Floer's seminal paintings in the course of the Eighties from a latest standpoint. the fabric contained the following was once built with particular purposes in brain. even though, it has now develop into transparent that the strategies used are vital for lots of present parts of study. a massive instance will be symplectic conception and gluing difficulties for self-dual metrics and different metrics with certain holonomy. the writer writes with the massive photo continuously in brain. in addition to a evaluate of the present kingdom of information, there are sections at the most likely course of destiny examine. integrated during this are connections among Floer teams and the distinguished Seiberg-Witten invariants. the implications defined during this quantity shape a part of the world referred to as Donaldson idea. the importance of this paintings is such that the writer was once provided the distinguished Fields Medal for his contribution.

Show description

Read Online or Download Floer Homology Groups in Yang-Mills Theory PDF

Best differential geometry books

Minimal surfaces and Teichmuller theory

The notes from a suite of lectures writer brought at nationwide Tsing-Hua collage in Hsinchu, Taiwan, within the spring of 1992. This notes is the a part of publication "Thing Hua Lectures on Geometry and Analisys".

Complex, contact and symmetric manifolds: In honor of L. Vanhecke

This publication is targeted at the interrelations among the curvature and the geometry of Riemannian manifolds. It comprises study and survey articles in accordance with the most talks added on the overseas Congress

Differential Geometry and the Calculus of Variations

During this e-book, we research theoretical and functional facets of computing tools for mathematical modelling of nonlinear structures. a couple of computing innovations are thought of, resembling equipment of operator approximation with any given accuracy; operator interpolation options together with a non-Lagrange interpolation; equipment of method illustration topic to constraints linked to strategies of causality, reminiscence and stationarity; equipment of method illustration with an accuracy that's the most sensible inside of a given category of types; tools of covariance matrix estimation;methods for low-rank matrix approximations; hybrid equipment in keeping with a mixture of iterative methods and most sensible operator approximation; andmethods for info compression and filtering below clear out version should still fulfill regulations linked to causality and varieties of reminiscence.

Additional resources for Floer Homology Groups in Yang-Mills Theory

Example text

1]), and the ideas can be extended to reducibles (we need not worry about potential technical difficulties here since we need the result only for motivation). The horizontal condition can be expressed directly in terms of the connection in four dimensions. We say a connection A on π ∗ (P ) is in temporal gauge if the covariant derivative of any section lifted up from Y along d in the R-direction vanishes. 9: ∂ At = it (FA ), ∂t d , and At is the family of where it denotes contraction by the vector dt connections on P obtained by restriction to slices.

It follows then from the argument above that DA is Fredholm if a = a1 + a2 where a1 ∈ C0 and a2 ∈ L4 . 3 The addition property The index invariant defined in the previous Section has a simple formal property which is basic to Floer’s theory. Let A be an adapted connection (with acyclic limits) on a bundle P over a 4-manifold X with tubular ends, as considered above, and suppose that X contains two boundary components Y, Y , where Y is isometric to Y with the reversed orientation. More precisely, X has an end Y × (0, ∞) and another end Y × (0, ∞).

2 The index 51 D then it follows immediately from the definition of the formal adjoint that D∗ (g) = 0. 1. Thus g is in the orthogonal complement of the image of D and we have shown that (Im D)⊥ = ker D∗ ∩ L2 . One should notice here one difference between our set-up and the usual compact case: the failure of a ‘Rellich lemma’ in our function spaces. That is, the embedding L21 → L2 is not compact. To see this one need only consider the translates of a compactly supported section over the tube. Of course, in the usual case this Rellich lemma gives immediately the finite dimensionality of ker D.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.92 of 5 – based on 12 votes